The Medtronic AF advantages across our portfolio

  • Increase the accurate and timely diagnosis of AF1
  • Improve AF patient outcomes2–5
  • May reduce AF-related use of healthcare resources3,6
  • Use the LINQ™ family of ICMs (Reveal LINQ™ ICM and LINQ II™ ICM) to make data-guided management decisions such as medical management, including anticoagulation7–10

Detect AF

Timely and accurate AF detection and monitoring through device-based algorithms

LINQ™ family of ICMs 

LINQ™ ICMs provide data that enables clinicians to objectively diagnose and monitor both asymptomatic and symptomatic AF.11

This data results in the measure of true AF burden and enables data-driven decisions, including those related to medications and treatments such as anticoagulants or ablation.7–10

  

Highest published detection accuracy of 95–96% episode PPV12–14

Cobalt™ XT VR ICD
Cobalt™ VR ICD

Using the TruAF™ detection algorithm, Medtronic single-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICDs) are the only ICDs that can detect AF with a traditional lead.

  • 34% of patients had AF detected at six months.15

Watch as Dr. Alan Cheng discusses the importance of AF detection in a single-chamber ICD.

Dr. Alan Cheng AF detection video

Watch as Dr. Alan Cheng discusses the importance of AF detection in a single-chamber ICD.


Reduce AF

Exclusive algorithms demonstrated to reduce the risk and duration of AF

Managed Ventricular Pacing (MVP™)

Reduces unnecessary RV pacing by 99%16

  • Every 1% of unnecessary RV pacing is accompanied by a 1% greater AF risk.17

Reactive ATP™ algorithm

Reduces the duration of AT/AF18

  • ≥ 1 day by 19%
  • ≥ 7 days by 36%
  • ≥ 30 days by 44%

AdaptivCRT™ algorithm

46% reduction in AF risk19

The Reactive ATP™ (rATP) algorithm delivers atrial antitachycardia pacing (ATP) to terminate an ongoing AF episode after a programmed interval, or when the rhythm organizes and/or slows. Recent evidence shows rATP reduces the likelihood of patients experiencing AT/AF.18 Learn more in this informative video as CRHF Chief Medical Officer, Dr. Rob Kowal, discusses the data.

Nearly 20 years of research and physician collaboration resulted in cardiac device algorithm innovations that help manage AF.

Watch Dr. Amin Al-Ahmad walk through this history and discuss the AdaptivCRT™ algorithm, which reduces AF risk,19 and the Reactive ATP algorithm, which reduces AF duration.18

To view the full webcast, visit medtronicacademy.com/globalgrandrounds.


Respond to AF

Exclusive feature to improve effective CRT delivery in the presence of AF

EffectivCRT™ during AF algorithm

Up to 16% increase in effective CRT delivery20

 

The AdaptivCRT™ algorithm optimizes CRT pacing every minute whether AV conduction is normal, prolonged, or blocked. The EffectivCRT during AF algorithm automatically changes the pacing rate to increase effective CRT delivery during AF by up to 16%.20

 

Dive deeper with Ruth Klepfer, senior research manager, as she explains how these two CRT algorithms work together to help manage AF in this short video.



Treat AF

Restore life‘s rhythm by unlocking potential through novel and efficient technology built on unmatched experience​.

Learn how catheter-based ablation may be used to treat arrhythmias.

This is an image of the Medtronic family of ablation catheters, including the Sphere-9™ ablation catheter, the PulseSelect™ pulsed field ablation system, and the Arctic Front Advance Pro™ cryoablation catheter.

Continuous long-term cardiac monitoring

Continued cardiac monitoring after an AF ablation with the Medtronic LINQ™ family of ICMs provides comprehensive data including AF burden, activity level, and heart rate variability. Insertable cardiac monitors remain the gold standard for the detection of AF recurrence and quantification of AF burden.†,21

† Compared to intermittent monitoring.

LINQ™ family of ICMs, including Reveal LINQ™ and LINQ II™ ICM, shown horizontally


Resources

Products

Filter by
  1. Pürerfellner H, Sanders P, Sarkar S, et al. Adapting detection sensitivity based on evidence of irregular sinus arrhythmia to improve atrial fibrillation detection in insertable cardiac monitors. Europace. 2018;20(Fl_3):f321–f328. doi: 10.1093/europace/eux272.
  2. Packer DL, Kowal RC, Wheelan KR, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(16):1713–1723. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.11.064.
  3. Boriani G, Manolis AS, Tukkie R, et al. Effects of enhanced pacing modalities on health care resource utilization and costs in bradycardia patients: An analysis of the randomized MINERVA trial. Heart Rhythm. 2015;12(6):1192–1200. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.02.017.
  4. Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2235–2245. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1602014.
  5. Kuck KH, Fürnkranz A, Chun KR, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: reintervention, rehospitalization, and quality-of-life outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(38):2858–2865. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw285.
  6. Chun KRJ, Brugada J, Elvan A, et al. The impact of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation on healthcare utilization and costs: an economic analysis from the FIRE AND ICE Trial. J Am Heart Assoc. 2017;6(8):e006043. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.117.006043.
  7. Passman R, Leong-Sit P, Andrei AC, et al. Targeted anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation guided by continuous rhythm assessment with an insertable cardiac monitor: The Rhythm Evaluation for Anticoagulation With Continuous Monitoring (REACT.COM) Pilot Study. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016;27(3):264–270. doi: 10.1111/jce.12864.
  8. Zuern CS, Kilias A, Berlitz P, et al. Anticoagulation after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation guided by implantable cardiac monitors. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015;38(6):688–693. doi: 10.1111/pace.12625.
  9. Mascarenhas DAN, Farooq MU, Ziegler PD, Kantharia BK. Role of insertable cardiac monitors in anticoagulation therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation at high risk of bleeding. Europace. 2016;18(6):799–806. doi: 10.1093/europace/euv350.
  10. Pothineni NVK, Amankwah N, Santangeli P, et al. Continuous rhythm monitoring-guided anticoagulation after atrial fibrillation ablation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2021;32(2):345–353. doi: 10.1111/jce.14864.
  11. Witkowski M, Bissinger A, Grycewicz T, Lubinski A. Asymptomatic atrial fibrillation in patients with atrial fibrillation and implanted pacemaker. Int J Cardiol. 2017;277:583–588. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.10.097.
  12. Pürerfellner H, Gillis AM, Holbrook R, Hettrick DA. Accuracy of atrial tachyarrhythmia detection in implantable devices with arrhythmia therapies. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27(7):983–992. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2004.00569.x.
  13. Ziegler PD, et al. Accuracy of atrial fibrillation detection in implantable pacemakers. Presented at HRS 2013 (PO02-08).
  14. QADoc DSN026170, Version 2.0, AT/AF duration performance comparison. Medtronic data on file.
  15. Boriani G, Deshmukh A, Brown ML Koehler J, Friedman PA. Understanding the incidence of AF in single chamber ICD patients: a real world analysis. EP Europace. 2017;19(S3):iii154. https://doi.org/10.1093/ehjci/eux151.022
  16. Chen S, Chen K, Tao Q, et al. Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing by managed ventricular pacing and search AV+ algorithms in pacemaker patients: 12-month follow-up results of a randomized study. Europace. 2014;16(11):1595–1602.doi: 10.1093/europace/euu055.
  17. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 2003;1107(23):2932–2937. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000072769.17295.B1.
  18. Crossley GH, Padeletti L, Zweibel S, Hudnall JH, Zhang Y, Boriani G. Reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing therapy reduces atrial tachyarrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42(7):970–979. doi: 10.1111/pace.13696.
  19. Birnie D, Hudnall H, Lemke B, et al. Continuous optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy reduces atrial fibrillation in heart failure patients: Results of the Adaptive Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy Trial. Heart Rhythm. 2017;14(12):1820–1825. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.08.017.
  20. Plummer CJ, Frank CM, Bári Z, et al. A novel algorithm increases the delivery of effective cardiac resynchronization therapy during atrial fibrillation: The CRTee randomized crossover trial. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(3):369–375. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.10.026.
  21. Aguilar M, Macie L, Deyell MW, et al. The influence of monitoring strategy on assessment of ablation success and post-ablation atrial fibrillation burden assessment: Implications for practice and clinical trial design. Circulation. 2022;145(1):21–30. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.056109.