Item number | Description | Mass (g) | Volume (mL) | Size — height × width × depth (mm) | Connector |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
W3DR01 | Azure™ S DR MRI SureScan™ pacemaker | 22.5 | 12.75 | 46.6 × 50.8 × 7.4 | IS-1 BI/UNI |
W3SR01 | Azure™ S SR MRI SureScan™ pacemaker | 22.5 | 12.25 | 42.6 × 50.8 × 7.4 | IS-1 BI/UNI |
W2DR01 | Azure™ XT DR MRI SureScan™ pacemaker | 22.5 | 12.75 | 46.6 × 50.8 × 7.4 | IS-1 BI/UNI |
W1SR01 | Azure™ XT SR MRI SureScan™ pacemaker | 22.5 | 12.25 | 42.6 × 50.8 × 7.4 | IS-1 BI/UNI |
Pacemakers
Azure™ MRI SureScan™ pacemaker
<p>The Azure™ MRI SureScan™ pacemaker manages atrial fibrillation (AF) in pacemaker patients with tablet-based programming and app-based remote monitoring.</p>
Features
Detects AF episodes
Highest published AF episode detection accuracy (PPV)†,‡,4–7
95–96% AF episode detection accuracy (PPV)5–7
Reduces AF risk and duration
Exclusive algorithms demonstrated to reduce the risk and the duration of AF
36% relative reduction in AT/AF episodes > 7 days with Reactive ATP™ algorithm‡,8
Reduces unnecessary RV9 pacing with the MVP™ feature
Right-ventricular (RV) pacing is associated with an increased risk of heart failure (HF) hospitalization.10
RV pacing is associated with a 1% increase in risk of AF for each 1% increase in cumulative RV pacing.10
- MVP algorithm reduces unnecessary RV pacing by 99%.9
Improves device longevity
Updated hardware architecture optimizes circuity to reduce current circuitry drain and improve longevity.11
Reimagined connectivity with BlueSync™ technology
BlueSync™ technology within Azure™ enables secure, wireless communication.
Streamlined workflows
Timely alerts of clinically relevant events12,13
Time to a clinical decision was about seven times faster with the use of Medtronic CareAlert™ notifications compared to standard office follow-up.14
CareAlert™ notifications can be programmed and viewed only by the clinician:
AT/AF burden notification
Lead impedance
Low battery voltage at recommended replacement time (RRT)
VT episodes
Fast ventricular rate (VR) during AT/AF
Capture Management™
Percentage ventricular pacing
Ordering information
Resources
Similar products
-
Adapta™ pacemaker
The Adapta™ pacing system includes pacing with automaticity.
-
Advisa™ MRI SureScan™ pacemaker
Advisa™ MRI SureScan™ implantable pacing generators (IPGs) are approved for 1.5T and 3T full-body MRI scans.
-
Micra™ AV2 leadless pacemaker
Micra™ AV2 provides an unmatched leadless pacing experience for patients with bradycardia.
-
Micra™ VR2 leadless pacemaker
Micra™ VR2 provides an unmatched leadless pacing experience for patients with bradycardia.
The Bluetooth®* word mark and logos are registered trademarks owned by Bluetooth SIG, Inc. and any use of such marks by Medtronic is under license.
† A controlled, head-to-head study evaluating the comparative performance of device algorithms has not been done. AF detection accuracy rates determined from independent clinical trials are presented for reference.
‡ Detection accuracy is compared using PPV, which is the percentage of all AT/AF episodes detected by the individual device detection algorithm that were adjudicated as true AT/AF.
- Boriani G, Glotzer TV, Ziegler PD, et al. Detection of new atrial fibrillation in patients with cardiac implanted electronic devices and factors associated with transition to higher device-detected atrial fibrillation burden. Heart Rhythm. 2018;15(3):376–383.
- Stewart S, Hart CL, Hole DJ, McMurray JJ. A population-based study of the long-term risks associated with atrial fibrillation: 20-year follow-up of the Renfrew/Paisley study. Am J Med. 2002;113(5):359–364.
- Wolf PA, Abbott RD, Kannel WB. Atrial fibrillation as an independent risk factor for stroke: the Framingham Study. Stroke. 1991;22(8):983–988.
- Sprenger M. Comparison of manufacturer’s AT/AF detection accuracy across clinical studies. Medtronic data on file. January 2015.
- Pürerfellner H, Gillis AM, Holbrook R, Hettrick DA. Accuracy of atrial tachyarrhythmia detection in implantable devices with arrhythmia therapies. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2004;27(7):983–992.
- Ziegler PD, et al. Accuracy of Atrial Fibrillation Detection in Implantable Pacemakers. Presented at HRS 2013 (PO02-08); Denver, CO.
- Based on internal test report QADoc DSN026170, version 2.0. AT/AF duration performance comparison.
- Crossley GH, Padeletti L, Zweibel S, Hudnall JH, Zhang Y, Boriani G. Reactive atrial-based antitachycardia pacing therapy reduces atrial tachyarrhythmias. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42(7):970–979.
- Gillis AM, Pürerfellner H, Israel CW, et al. Reduction of unnecessary right ventricular pacing due to the managed ventricular pacing (MVP) mode in patients with symptomatic bradycardia. Benefit for both sinus node disease and AV block indications. Presented at HRS 2015 (Abstract AB21-1); Boston, MA.
- Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation. 2003;107(23):2932–2937.
- Orenga M. Azure™ longevity increase compared to Advisa™. September 2017. Medtronic data on file.
- Medtronic Azure™ XT DR MRI SureScan™ device manual, M964338A001B. 2016-10-22.
- Howard K. Alert notification timing. September 2017. Medtronic data on file.
- Crossley GH, Boyle A, Vitense H, Chang Y, Mead RH; CONNECT Investigators. The CONNECT (Clinical Evaluation of Remote Notification to Reduce Time to Clinical Decision) trial: the value of wireless remote monitoring with automatic clinician alerts. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;57(10):1181–1189.