Guide catheters

Telescope™ guide extension catheter

<p>The Telescope™ guide extension catheter is used to expand access to coronary and peripheral vascular and to facilitate placement of interventional devices.</p>

Ordering information
Contact a representative

Features

Superior deliverability3 and pushability4

Telescope™ GEC has superior deliverability3 to assist in difficult cases.

Telescope™ guide extension catheter deliverability chart shows maximum force is 182; lowest compared to other GECs.

Pushability is a critical component of deliverability.

Telescope™ guide extension catheter pushability chart shows max force is 432; highest compared to other GECs.

TruFlex™ soft polymer tip

You want a soft, flexible tip with responsiveness when you need it. Our extruded TruFlex™ tip required at least 39% less force to deflect.5

Soft polymer tip graph shows Telescope™ guide extension catheter has maximum force of 33, lowest in comparison.

Tip design

Learn about the Telescope™ guide extension catheter tip, marker band, distal segment, and main jacket.

 

  1. 2 mm TruFlex™ tip
  2. 1 mm distal marker band 
  3. 5 mm distal segment featuring soft polymer
  4. Main jacket

SmoothPass technology

Telescope™ GEC with SmoothPass technology includes three components that work together to help deliver stents, balloons, and other interventional devices.

After positioning a GEC, the ability to deliver stents, balloons, and other interventional devices through the catheter is critical. Learn how Telescope GEC can help.
Check out the Telescope™ guide extension catheter straightened out, showing entry port, polymer on-ramp, and tapered distal pushwire.
  1. Tapered distal pushwire section — transitions from solid, round, proximal pushwire for flexibility6
  2. Short 4 cm polymer on-ramp — maintains superior deliverability3 and channels interventional devices
  3. Entry port — contributes to smooth device entry and delivery

Telescope™ GEC in glass aortic arch model

Learn more about the Telescope™ guide extension catheter including design features and technology.
  1. Spade-shaped marker band confirms orientation of catheter on fluoroscopy
  2. Entry port
  3. Resolute Onyx™ DES traveling along the on-ramp toward the entry port
  4. On-ramp

Distal 25 cm of catheter

  • Coil-reinforced design and hydrophilic coating help improve flexibility and deliverability3, 6
  • Polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) liner provides a low-friction inner lumen6
Get details on the specific design features of the Telescope™ guide extension catheter.
  1. Flexible TruFlex soft polymer tip5
  2. Rigid polymer in proximal jacket for luminal integrity6
  3. Flexible polymer in main jacket for deliverability3
  4. Solid, round pushwire featuring superior pushability4

Ordering information

Item number French size (Fr)
TELE6F 6
TELE7F 7

Related links

Similar products

TM* Third-party brands are trademarks of their respective owners. All other brands are trademarks of a Medtronic company. 

† Bench test data from 2019 may not be indicative of clinical performance.

  1. Sambu N, Fernandez J, Shah NC, O’Kane P. The GuideLiner®: an interventionist’s experience of their first 50 cases: “the mostly good, rarely bad, beware of the ugly!” Interv. Cardiol. 2013;5(4):389–404.
  2. Based on guide catheter and aspiration catheter market share reports and data on file at Medtronic.

  1. Deliverability bench testing†: Telescope™ GEC 6 F vs. GuideLiner™* V3 GEC 5.5 F/6 F vs. Guidezilla™* II GEC 6 F. The overall statistical difference via one-way ANOVA was P<0.001. Statistically significant differences existed between Telescope and each of the competitor products for this assessment. N = 8 for each GEC tested. 10 test cycles per GEC. Results measure maximum force. 10839897DOC_B. 2019.
  2. Pushability bench testing†: Telescope™ GEC 6 F vs. GuideLiner™* V3 GEC 6 F vs. Guidezilla™* II GEC 6 F. The overall statistical difference via one-way ANOVA was P<0.001. Statistically significant differences existed between Telescope and each of the competitor products for this assessment. N = 8 for each GEC tested. Results measure maximum force. 10839897DOC_B. 2019.
  3. Soft tip compression bench testing†: Telescope™ GEC 6 F vs. GuideLiner™* V3 GEC 5.5 F/6 F vs. Guidezilla™* II GEC 6 F. The overall statistical difference via one-way ANOVA was P<0.001. Statistically significant differences existed between Telescope and each of the competitor products for this assessment. N = 8 for each GEC tested. Results measure maximum force. 10839897DOC_B. 2019.
  4. Based on the Telescope GEC design freeze document (internal design document). 10703702DOC_C. 2019.