| Item number | Description | Units per box |
|---|---|---|
| S100712 | Short, 12 mm cannula and dilator with radially expandable sleeve and 12–15 mm reducer | 10 |
| S100710 | Short, 10 mm cannula and dilator with radially expandable sleeve and 5–10 mm reducer | 10 |
| S100705 | Short, 5 mm cannula and dilator with radially expandable sleeve | 10 |
| S100700 | Short, radially expandable sleeve | 10 |
| S101012 | 12 mm cannula and dilator with radially expandable sleeve and 12–15 mm reducer | 10 |
| S101010 | 10 mm cannula and dilator with radially expandable sleeve and 5–10 mm reducer | 10 |
| S101005 | 5 mm cannula and dilator with radially expandable sleeve | 10 |
| S101000 | Radially expandable sleeve | 10 |
Bladeless trocars
Step™ access system
Bladeless trocars
Step™ access system
The Step™ access system is intended for abdominal and thoracic procedures and offers dilatation access to cavities for diagnostic and operative purposes.
Description
The Step™ access system incorporates Step™ radial dilation technology with a truly bladeless obturator. The defect size from radially dilating trocars has been shown to be smaller than bladed trocars.†,‡,§,1
Ordering information
Similar products
-
Mini Step™ access systemThe Mini Step™ access system is intended for abdominal and thoracic procedures and offers dilatation access to cavities for diagnostic and operative purposes.
-
VersaOne™ bladeless trocarThe VersaOne™ bladeless trocar is intended for use in a variety of endoscopic procedures to create and maintain a port of entry.
-
VersaStep™ bladeless trocarThe VersaStep™ bladeless trocar is available in multiple sizes to enable access during laparoscopic and minimally invasive procedures.
† Measured defect size of 5.4 × 3.8 mm was significantly smaller than linear bladed trocars (10.5 × 6.1 mm, P < .001).
‡ Functional defect size as measured by bead technique of 13.12 ± 0.35 mm was significantly smaller than linear bladed trocars (14.12 ± 0.64 mm, P < .001).
§ Animal data is not necessarily indicative of human clinical outcomes.
- Shafer DM, Khajanchee Y, Wong J, Swanström LL. Comparison of five different abdominal access trocar systems: analysis of insertion force, removal force, and defect size. Surg Innov. 2006;13(3):183–189.