CLINICAL & ECONOMIC OUTCOMES

MIS offers clinical and economic benefits.1,2,3

From a clinical perspective, MIS is associated with improved outcomes through reduced rates of complications such as infections, blood loss, incisional hernias, adhesions, and postoperative pain.

Economic benefits include reduced length of hospital stay and readmissions, decreased recovery times, and lower costs across the episode of care.

After hospital discharge, MIS patients typically are back to their daily routines faster than those who have had open surgery.

STRATEGIC PARTNERSHIPS

We have a passion for innovation and collaborate with expert industry players to transform healthcare with technology and protocols to deliver better clinical outcomes together.

Who are our Partners:

  • Clinicians, hospitals, payer bodies, government bodies to deploy innovative business models
  • Societies to develop policies and guidelines around the use of minimally invasive therapies
  • Well-established advocacy groups, to reach patient audiences to showcase the benefits of MIS

INTERESTED IN BEING A PARTNER?

SERVICES AND SOLUTIONS

Medtronic creates end-to-end in-hospital integrated solutions to help you solve your challenges across the care continuum.

We offer optimized clinical pathways, value-based health care solutions, protocol improvement programs for key therapies, and support the expansion into disease-centric services. 

If you are interested in hearing about value-based models from expert partners, we invite you to complete the form below.

ACCESS TO RELATED WORLD CLASS RESOURCES

  • 1. Fitch K, Engel T, Bochner A. Cost Differences Between Open and Minimally Invasive Surgery. Managed Care. 2015 Sep;24(9):40-8.

  • 2. Tiwari MM, Reynoso JF, High R, Tsang AW, Oleynikov D. Safety, efficacy, and cost effectiveness of common laparoscopic procedures. Surg Endosc. 2011;25(4):1127-1135.

  • 3. Roumm AR, Pizzi L, Goldfarb NI, Cohn H. Minimally invasive: minimally reimbursed? An examination of six laparoscopic surgical procedures. Surg Innovation.2005;12(3):261-287.