THE RIGHT TOOL MAKES ALL THE DIFFERENCE

BiZact™ has been built for one purpose and designed in collaboration with ENTs, to optimize tonsillectomies with clinically proven benefits for you and more importantly, your patients.

A DIFFERENT APPROACH TO TONSILLECTOMY

DISCOVER THE CLINICALLY PROVEN BENEFITS OF BIZACT™1,2,3,†

The BiZact™ device has been clinically shown to:

  • Reduce intraoperative blood loss1,††
  • Improve procedural efficiency1,4,5,‡

DESIGNED SPECIFICALLY FOR TONSILLECTOMY

BIZACT™ TONSILLECTOMY DEVICE OPTIMIZES THE PROCEDURE FROM START TO FINISH

Surgeons using the BiZact™ device are completing cases in about half the time1,4,5,†† compared to the Coblator™* device and electrocautery.  Because the BiZact™ device: 

  • Offers a fast and easy setup6,₤
  • In‑line activation facilitates efficient sealing and transection
  • Reduces intraoperative bleeding1-3,§,Ω

LEARN FROM YOUR PEERS

Global Webinar Recording

PROCEDURAL VIDEOS AND GUIDES

Videos

Tips to help you optimize your technique

  • † Used in 48 cases, including adults (22+) US (18+) EU the use of the BiZact™ tonsillectomy device resulted in non‑measurable bloodloss compared to published literature stating 10.83 ml for Coblator™*, 27.08 ml for electrocautery [Roje], and 125 ml [Lachanas] with cold knife.
  • †† Used in 48 cases, including adults (22+) US (18+) EU the use of the BiZact™ tonsillectomy device resulted in non‑measurable bloodloss.
  • ‡ Used in 48 cases, including adults (22+) US (18+) EU. Average procedure time for the BiZact™ tonsillectomy device was 7 min. compared to published literature stating 14.8 (pediatric) and 20.5 (adult) min. [Lee] for electrocautery and 27.3 min. [Omrani] for Coblator™*.
  • § Used in 48 cases, including adults (22+) US (18+) EU. The use of the BiZact™ tonsillectomy device resulted in non‑measurable blood loss compared to published literature stating 10.83 ml for Coblator™*, 27.08 ml for electrocautery [Roje], and 125 ml for cold knife [Lachanas].
  • ₤ 12 out of 12 surgeons and 13 out of 15 nurses surveyed agreed.
  • Ω Compared to electrocautery, Coblator™*, and cold knife.
  • 1. Karni, R., Attner, P. (2018). A prospective, multi‑center, single arm, non‑comparative pilot study of BiZact on adults undergoing tonsillectomy. Data on file. Study sponsored by Medtronic. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02876575
  • 2. Roje Z, Racić G, Dogas Z, Pisac VP, Timms M. Postoperative morbidity and histopathologic characteristics of tonsillar tissue following coblation tonsillectomy in children: a prospective randomized single‑blinded study. Coll Antropol. 2009;33(1):293–298.
  • 3. Lachanas VA, Prokopakis EP, Bourolias CA, et al. LigaSure™ versus cold knife tonsillectomy. Laryngoscope. 2005;115(9):1591–1594.
  • 4. Lee SW, Jeon SS, Lee JD, Lee JY, Kim SC, Koh YW. A comparison of postoperative pain and complications in tonsillectomy using BiClamp forceps and electrocautery tonsillectomy. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;139(2):228‑234.
  • 5. Omrani M, Barati B, Omidifar N, Okhovvat AR, Hashemi SA. Coblation™* versus traditional tonsillectomy: A double blind randomized controlled trial. J Res Med Sci. 2012;17(1):45‑50.
  • 6. Based on internal test report #RE00073873 and #RE00079704, Independent surgeon and nurse feedback collected during Medtronic sponsored labs. January and February 2017.