placeUnited Kingdom
Contact & Support
Medtronic / Covidien Products / Mechanical Ventilation & Humidification Treatment / Ventilator Software / Puritan Bennett™ PAV+™ Software

You are entering HCP content only

Please note you are entering now content intended only for Healthcare Professionals.

Are you a HCP?

Overview

Promote More Natural Breathing† In Mechanical Ventilation

A full 71% of ventilated patients in the ICU show signs of agitation at least once during their stay1, often leading to the need for sedation. One cause of agitation in ventilated patients may be patient-ventilator asynchrony.

Puritan Bennett™ PAV+™ software can help clinicians address patient-ventilator asynchrony. It considers how a patient is breathing and enables the patient to determine the rate, depth and timing of each breath.

By improving the patient-ventilator relationship, clinicians can potentially make their patients more comfortable and help them breathe more naturally.†

How to Order

For additional information or to place an order, call Customer Service at +44 (0) 19 2320 2504.

Order Information
Order Code Description Unit of Measure Quantity
4-078208-00 Puritan Bennett™ 980 PAV+™ Upgrade Kit for PB840 Each 1
10122271 Puritan Bennett™ 980 Software PAV+™ Factory Install Each 1
10096530 Puritan Bennett™ 980 PAV+™ Software Upgrade Each 1

Order Information

HOW PURITAN BENNETT™ PAV+™ SOFTWARE WORKS

We believe mechanical ventilation can and should be more natural. Our PAV+™ software is a breath type that better manages work of breathing in spontaneously breathing patients and promotes natural breathing compared to conventional mechanical ventilation.†† 2 PAV+™ software manages the patient’s work of breathing differently than other traditional modes of mechanical ventilation†† in the following ways:3

1. With PAV+™ Breath Type, the Patient Defines Rate, Depth, and Timing
  • Flow is an indicator of demand. It tells us when the patient wants to begin inspiration, how deep the breath should be, when to end the breath and how often to breathe.4
  • PAV+™ software continuously monitors patient demand by measuring flow and volume every 5 milliseconds and by knowing the % Support set.
  • As patient demand changes, PAV+™ software can change support pressure within the same breath. 
  • Continuously displaying driving pressure, which when kept within the recommended range, has been shown to minimize lung injury and improve survival.5

When the % Support is set, the patient and the ventilator are sharing the work of breathing as defined by the clinician.

  • Work of breathing can be calculated using the equation of motion.6
  • When R and C are known, it’s possible to calculate patient-generated pressure (PMUS) and work of breathing in real time using the equation of motion.6,7,8,9,10
2. PMUS + PVENT = (flow x resistance) + (volume ÷ compliance)
  • PAV+™ software measures resistance and compliance every 4-10 breaths.
    • Driving pressure real-time feedback helps keep the patient at a safe level, reducing the risk of self-induced lung injury.
  • Once % Support is set, clinicians can use the work of breathing (WOB) bar for real-time feedback on how much work the patient is doing.
  • The work of breathing bar displays both total work of breathing (WOBTOT) and the patient work of breathing (WOBPT).
  • Adjust the % Support setting to maintain the patient’s WOB (WOBPT) within the green zone.
  • Associated fatigue values for work of breathing are shown as being outside the green zone.

The work of breathing bar, when coupled with good clinical assessment, can help take the guesswork out of determining the appropriate level of mechanical ventilation support. Providing real-time feedback on work of breathing helps the clinician keep the patient at a sustainable level of work—reducing the risk for respiratory muscle atrophy, but off-loading enough work to avoid fatigue.11,12,13

Understanding Patient-Ventilator Asynchrony

People display normal variability in their breathing patterns even at rest. In contrast, although a necessary medical intervention, mechanical ventilation uses some sort of fixed parameter in almost all currently available modes. If the mechanical breath is delivered in a fashion that the patient doesn’t want or expect (too short, not enough flow, too long, etc.), asynchrony between the ventilator and the patient, discomfort, anxiety, and fatigue can result.14

Different types of asynchrony occur at different rates and may elicit different patient effects.15 Studies evaluating the overall frequency of asynchronies found that 12-43% of patients exhibit asynchrony in greater than 10% of total breaths.16,17 In these patients, improving patient-ventilator synchrony may potentially result in less anxiety and need for sedation.1

In patients undergoing pressure-support ventilation (PSV), a high number of asynchronous breaths is associated with an almost fivefold increase in ICU mortality,16 a greater than threefold increase in median duration of mechanical ventilation, and a greater than twofold increase in median hospital length of stay.18 Prolonged mechanical ventilation (≥ 21 days) has been shown to be associated with a 23% increase in daily average cost per patient and a 3.3 times higher hospital cost, while also accounting for a disproportionate consumption of healthcare resources.19

Learn More

E-Learning

Discover our broad online education offering.

Acute Care & Monitoring

Discover how we can support you in providing the best care for all your critical care & acute care patients.

 

Medtronic announced that it has decided to keep the Patient Monitoring and Respiratory Intervention businesses as a part of Medtronic, given changing market conditions. These businesses will get increased investment and be combined and called Acute Care & Monitoring (ACM).

Medtronic also made the decision to exit the ventilator product line.

Amid evolving market conditions and a shift to lower acuity ventilators, this decision aligns with Medtronic’s strategy to concentrate resources on our market-leading positions and accelerate innovation-driven growth.

While this decision will take time and planning, we are committed to supporting our existing ventilation customers. We will continue to provide service and support throughout the ventilator life cycle, along with meeting our service contract obligations.
For more information, please visit our website.

Follow us on Facebook

Follow us on LinkedIn

Resources

Related Links

  • *Proportional Assist and PAV are registered trademarks of The University of Manitoba, Canada. Used under license.
  • † Compared to conventional mechanical ventilation (VC,VC+,PC,PS)
  • †† VC, VC+, PC, PS and PSV based modes
  • 1. Siegel MD. Management of agitation in the intensive care unit. Clin Chest Med. 2003;24(4):713-725.
  • 2. Pohlman MC, et al. Excessive tidal volume from breath stacking during lung-protective ventilation for acute lung injury. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(11):3019-3023.
  • 3. Puritan Bennett™ 980 Ventilator Operator's Manual
  • 4. Wilkins RL, Stoller JK, Scanlan CL. Egan’s Fundamentals of Respiratory Care. 8th ed. Louis, MO: Mosby; 2003.
  • 5. Amato MB, Meade MO, Slutsky AS, et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):747–755.
  • 6. Younes M, et al. Proportional Assist Ventilation. In: Tobin MJ. Principles And Practice of Mechanical Ventilation, Third Edition. McGraw Hill Professional; 2012.315-346.
  • 7. Bosma K, Ferreyra G, Ambrogio C, et al. Patient-ventilator interaction and sleep in mechanically ventilated patients: pressure support versus proportional assist ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2007;35(4):1048-1054.
  • 8. Younes M, Webster K, Kun J, Roberts D, Masiowski B. A method for measuring passive elastance during proportional assist ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001;164(1):50-60.
  • 9. Grasso S, Ranieri WM, Brochard L, et al. Closed loop proportional assist ventilation (PAV): Results of a phase II multicenter trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001, 163:A303.
  • 10. Younes M, Riddle W, Polacheck J. A model for the relationship between respiratory neural and mechanical outputs: III. Validation. J Appl Physiol. 1981;51(4):990-1001.
  • 11. Hermans G. Increased duration of mechanical ventilation is associated with decreased diaphragmatic force: a prospective observational study. Crit Care. 2010;14:R127.
  • 12. Anzueto A, Peters JI, Tobin MJ, et al. Effects of prolonged controlled mechanical ventilation on diaphragmatic function in healthy adult baboons. Crit Care Med. 1997;25(7):1187-1190.
  • 13. Haitsma JJ. Diaphragmatic dysfunction in mechanical ventilation. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2011;24(2):214-218.
  • 14. De Wit M. Monitoring of patient ventilator interaction at the bedside. Respiratory Care. 2011;56(1):61-68.
  • 15. Epstein SK. How often does patient-ventilator asynchrony occur and what are the consequences? Respiratory care. 2011;56(1):25-38.
  • 16. Blanch L, Villagra A, Sales B, et al. Asynchronies during mechanical ventilation are associated with mortality. Intensive care medicine. 2015;41(4):633-641.
  • 17. Vignaux L, Vargas F, Roeseler J, et al. Patient-ventilator asynchrony during non-invasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure: a multicenter study. Intensive care medicine. 2009;35(5):840-846.
  • 18. de Wit M, Miller KB, Green DA, Ostman HE, Gennings C, Epstein SK. Ineffective triggering predicts increased duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):2740-2745.
  • 19. Loss SH, De Oliveira RP, Maccari JG, Savi A, Boniatti MM, Hetzel MP, et al. The reality of patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation: a multicenter study. Rev Bras Ter Intensiv. 2015;27:26–35.
Corporate Resources
Medical Surgical Portfolio
Additional Resources
Contact Us
Medtronic Limited

Building 9, Croxley Park

Hatters Lane

Watford, WD18 8WW

United Kingdom

©2025 Medtronic