Weaning Management Solutions

Discover the product solutions Medtronic offers to Manage Weaning

Weaning Readiness and Spontaneous Breathing Trial (SBT) Monitoring Application

The Vital Sync™ weaning readiness and spontaneous breathing trial (SBT) Monitoring application may allow clinicians to streamline and simplify the implementation of protocolized weaning. By continuously monitoring a configurable set of physiologic variables like RR, VT, VE, heart rate, and blood pressure, the Vital Sync™ weaning readiness feature alerts clinicians when patients demonstrate a readiness and tolerance for an SBT based on ACCP/AARC/SCCM guidelines.1

Once clinicians initiate a spontaneous breathing trial, the Vital Sync™ SBT remote monitoring feature evaluates multiple patient parameters against the SBT protocol criteria.

Accelerate Weaning Readiness with Puritan Bennett™ Ventilation Systems

Puritan Bennett™ ventilation systems are designed to promote more natural breathing and help improve patient comfort.2 In doing so, Puritan Bennett™ ventilation systems help improve weaning success by improving patient-ventilator synchrony and reducing work of breathing.3,4,5

PAV+™ Patient software - Engineered to Help Patients Breathe More Naturally

When patients are ventilated with Proportional Assist Ventilation Plus patient software (PAV+™ patient software), sedation is limited6 so the patient’s respiratory drive remains intact and neither driving pressure or VT are set by the caregiver.7 Instead, the patient’s intrinsic reflexes and instantaneous muscle activity control ventilation.7

E-Learning

Discover our broad online education offering.

Acute Care & Monitoring

PATIENT SAFETY IN OUR HANDS

Discover how we can support you in providing the best care for all your critical care & acute care patients.

  • 1. MacIntyre, N. R., Cook, D. J., Ely, E. W., Jr., et al. Evidence-based guidelines for weaning and discontinuing ventilatory support: a collective task force facilitated by the American College of Chest Physicians; the American Association for Respiratory Care; and the American College of Critical Care Medicine. Chest. 2001;120(6 Suppl):375S-395S.
  • 2. Elganady, A. A., Beshey, B. N., & Abdelaziz, A. A. H. (Writer) (2014).
  • 3. Grasso, S., Puntillo, F., Mascia, L., et al. Compensation for increase in respiratory workload during mechanical ventilation. Pressure-support versus proportional-assist ventilation. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2000;161(3 Pt 1):819-826.
  • 4. Akoumianaki, E., Prinianakis, G., Kondili, E., Malliotakis, P., & Georgopoulos, D. Physiologic comparison of neurally adjusted ventilator assist, proportional assist and pressure support ventilation in critically ill patients. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2014;203:82-89.
  • 5. Kondili, E., Prinianakis, G., Alexopoulou, C., Vakouti, E., Klimathianaki, M., & Georgopoulos, D. Respiratory load compensation during mechanical ventilation--proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors versus pressure support. Intensive Care Med. 2006;32(5):692-699.
  • 6. Georgopoulos, D., Xirouchaki, N., Tzanakis, N., & Younes, M. Driving pressure during assisted mechanical ventilation: Is it controlled by patient brain? Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2016;228:69-75.
  • 7. Wright, B. J. Lung-protective ventilation strategies and adjunctive treatments for the emergency medicine patient with acute respiratory failure. Emerg Med Clin North Am. 2014;32(4):871-887.
  • 8. Serpa Neto, A., Cardoso, S. O., Manetta, J. A., et al. Association between use of lung-protective ventilation with lower tidal volumes and clinical outcomes among patients without acute respiratory distress syndrome: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2012;308(16):1651-1659.
  • 9. Amato, M. B., Meade, M. O., Slutsky, A. S., et al. Driving pressure and survival in the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2015;372(8):747-755.
  • 10. Gilstrap, D., & MacIntyre, N. Patient-ventilator interactions. Implications for clinical management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2013;188(9):1058-1068.
  • 11. Costa, R., Spinazzola, G., Cipriani, F., et al. A physiologic comparison of proportional assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors (PAV+) versus pressure support ventilation (PSV). Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(9):1494-1500.
  • 12. Xirouchaki, N., Kondili, E., Klimathianaki, M., & Georgopoulos, D. Is proportional-assist ventilation with load-adjustable gain factors a user-friendly mode? Intensive Care Med. 2009;35(9):1599-1603
  • 13. de Wit, M., Miller, K. B., Green, D. A., Ostman, H. E., Gennings, C., & Epstein, S. K. Ineffective triggering predicts increased duration of mechanical ventilation. Crit Care Med. 2009;37(10):2740-2745.
  • 14. Carteaux, G., Mancebo, J., Mercat, A., et al. Bedside adjustment of proportional assist ventilation to target a predefined range of respiratory effort. Crit Care Med. 2013;41(9):2125-2132.