You are entering HCP content only

Please note you are entering now content intended only for Healthcare Professionals.

Are you a HCP?

Yes I am a HCP No I am not a HCP
placeSouth Africa
Contact us

V-Loc™ 90 wound closure device in C-section

The connection between mothers and their baby

Request more information

Better outcomes tomorrow start with improved uterine healing today.†,1,2

When it comes to enhancing C-section outcomes, uterine healing reigns supreme. The V-Loc™ device may help reduce the risk of uterine rupture in subsequent pregnancies.†,1–3
Read the clinical summary

Better healing when it matters most

V-Loc™ 90 device for a double-layer closure with the unique fishbone technique

The numbers tell the truth.

In comparison to conventional sutures, V-Loc™ device provides superior uterine healing for better results overall.
11.2%

Reduction in uterine niches after 24 months†,‡,4

Even tension distribution along the incision line†,5

1.4 mm

Reduction in the depth of uterine niches†,‡,4

No need to tie knots§,6

Elevate your C-section procedures with the V-Loc™ 90 device.

The V-Loc™ device is easier to use and is associated with significantly lower surgical difficulty in uterine wall repairs.†,7,8

V-Loc™ 90 wound closure device in C-section

The connection between mothers and their baby

The V-Loc™ device has demonstrated reduction in the time required to close uterine wall defects.†,9,10

Explore complete V-Loc™ portfolio

Learn more about the V-Loc™ barbed suture in C-section today.

The V-Loc™ barbed suture device represents advanced suture technology — backed by a company committed to delivering the performance surgeons need to provide the best patient experience.
Contact your suture specialist below to learn more.

Contact suture specialist
Resources

V-Loc™ Device Cesarean Scar Niches Alessandri Study

picture_as_pdf
View the Alessandri study

Comparison of Unidirectional Barbed Suture Compared to Conventional Braided Suture at the Time of Cesarean Section

picture_as_pdf View clinical paper summary

V-Loc™ Global Value dossier

picture_as_pdf Read dossier

V-Loc™ 90 absorbable wound closure devices are indicated for soft tissue approximation where use of an absorbable suture is appropriate.

The material on this website should not be considered the exclusive source of information, it does not replace or supersede information contained in the device manual(s). Please note that the intended use of a product may vary depending on geographical approvals.

See the device manual(s) for detailed information regarding the intended use, the implant procedure, indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions, and potential adverse events. For an MRI compatible device(s), consult the MRI information in the device manual(s) before performing an MRI. If a device is eligible for eIFU usage, instructions for use can be found at Medtronic’s website manuals.medtronic.com. Manuals can be viewed using a current version of any major internet  browser. For best results, use Adobe Acrobat® Reader with the browser. Medtronic products placed on European markets bear the CE mark and the UKCA mark, if applicable.

For any further information, contact your local Medtronic representative and/or consult the Medtronic website at cema.medtronic.com.

† As compared to conventional sutures.

‡ V-Loc™ 180 barbed suture or a conventional double-layer Monosyn® smooth suture

§ Animal data may not correlate with human clinical outcomes.

 

  1. Alessandri F, Evangelisti G, Centurioni MG, Gustavino C, Ferrero S, Barra F. Fishbone double‐layer barbed suture in cesarean section: a help in preventing long‐term obstetric sequelae? Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2021;304(3):573–576. doi:10.1007/s00404‐021‐06121‐8.
  2. Alessandri F, Centurioni MG, Perrone U, et al. Incidence and ultrasonographic characteristics of cesarean scar niches after uterine closure by double-layer barbed suture: a prospective comparative study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;162(3):895–905.
  3. Roberge S, Demers S, Girard M, et al. Impact of uterine closure on residual myometrial thickness after cesarean: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2016;214(4):507.e1507.e6.doi:10.1016/j.ajog.2015.10.916.
  4. Alessandri F, Centurioni MG, Perrone U, Evangelisti G, Urso C, Paratore M, Guida E, Nappini A, Gustavino C, Ferrero S, Barra F. Incidence and ultrasonographic characteristics of cesarean scar niches after uterine closure by double-layer barbed suture: A prospective comparative study. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2023;162(3):895–905.
  5. Fouda UM, Elsetohy KA, Elshaer HS. Barbed versus conventional suture: a randomized trial for suturing the endometrioma bed after laparoscopic excision of ovarian endometrioma. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2016;23(6):962–968.
  6. Zaruby J, Gingras K, Taylor J, Maul D. An in vivo comparison of barbed suture devices and conventional monofilament sutures for cosmetic skin closure: biomechanical wound strength and histology. Aesthet Surg J. 2011;31(2):232–240.
  7. Song T, Kim TJ, Kim WY, Lee SH. Comparison of barbed suture versus traditional suture in laparoendoscopic single-site myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;185:99–102.
  8. Alessandri F, Remorgida V, Venturini PL, Ferrero S. Unidirectional barbed suture versus continuous suture with intracorporeal knots in laparoscopic myomectomy: a randomized study. J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2010;17(6):725 729. doi:10.1016/j.jmig.2010.06.007.
  9. Angioli R, Plotti F, Montera R, et al. A new type of absorbable barbed suture for use in laparoscopic myomectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2012;117(3):220–223. doi:10.1016/j.ijgo.2011.12.023.
  10. Song T, Kim TJ, Kim WY, Lee SH. Comparison of barbed suture versus traditional suture in laparoendoscopic single site myomectomy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2015;185–99 102. doi:10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.11.022.