Take a deeper dive into the vessel sealing and dissection advantages of the LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw device.
1. 3.1 mm longer6,§§
2. Vessel sealing5,¶ and cutting3,#,†† to the tips of the jaws
A. LigaSure™ Maryland jaw
B. LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw
† The LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw device is indicated for use in general surgery and such surgical specialties as colorectal, bariatric, urologic, vascular, thoracic, and gynaecologic.
‡ Compared to their current preferred device; 21 of 23 surgeons agreed during clinical procedures.
§ Thick tissue is defined as nondissected vascular tissue or fatty tissue.
|| 29 out of 29 surgeons agree.
¶ 30 out of 30 surgeons agree.
# 24 out of 29 surgeons agree.
†† Compared to legacy LigaSure™ devices.
‡‡ LigaSure™ XP Maryland seal plate length (22.555 mm) vs. LigaSure™ Maryland seal plate length (19.406 mm) as measured from seal plate tip to device tissue stop.
§§ LigaSure™ XP Maryland cut length (21.844 mm) vs. LigaSure™ Maryland cut length (18.034 mm).
|||| Bench tissue may not be indicative of clinical performance.
¶¶ Compared to their current preferred device; 20 of 23 surgeons agreed during clinical procedures.
##LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw width by height (1.47 mm by 2.13 mm) vs. Ethicon Enseal™* X1 width by height (1.57 mm by 2.90 mm).
†††LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw length & aperture (23.368 mm & 14.437 mm) vs. Ethicon Enseal™* X1 jaw length & aperture (22.682 mm & 13.462 mm) as measured from device tip to tissue stop.
‡‡‡LigaSure™ XP Maryland cut length (21.844 mm) vs. Ethicon Enseal™* X1 cut length (21.133 mm).
§§§LigaSure™ XP Maryland uncut seal length on seal plate (1.143 mm) vs. Ethicon Enseal™* X1 uncut seal length on seal plate (1.727 mm).
1. Based on COGNOS and historical sales data, FY01–FY20. October 2019.
2. Based on internal report #RE00457416 Rev A, Product introduction report: LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw sealer/divider. May 2023.
3. Based on internal report #RE00376094 Rev A, LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw sealer/divider surgeon validation marketing report. Dec. 7–9 and 14–16, 2021.
4. Based on internal report #RE00442444 Rev A, Comparison of the renal artery bench bundle burst pressure performance with the LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw sealer/divider, Voyant™* Maryland Fusion, Enseal™* X1 curved jaw, and LigaSure™ LF19XX devices. Jan. 23, 2023.
5. Based on internal report #RE00372649 Rev A, Archer surgeon summative evaluation report. March 22, 2022.
6. Based on internal test report #RE00455509 Rev B, Competitive device analysis — LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw sealer/divider.
7. Based on internal report #RE00380835 Rev B, Sticking evaluation with the LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw sealer/divider, Aesculap Caiman™* 5 Maryland, Voyant™* Maryland Fusion, Ethicon Enseal™* X1 curved jaw, LigaSure™ LF18XX blunt tip, and LF19XX Maryland devices.
8. Based on internal report #RE00380822 Rev A, Comparison of the renal artery seal burst pressure performance with the LigaSure™ XP Maryland jaw sealer/divider, Caiman™* 5 Maryland, Voyant™* Maryland Fusion, Enseal™* X1 curved jaw, Sonicision™ 7 curved jaw, Harmonic™* 1100, LigaSure™ LF18XX, and LF19XX devices.
Please refer to the Instructions for Use for a complete list of indications, contraindications, warnings, precautions and other important medical information. Always read and follow the Instructions for Use
Learn More