You just clicked a link to go to another website. If you continue, you will leave this site and go to a site run by someone else.
Medtronic Canada does not review or control the content on the other website, and is not responsible for any business dealings or transactions you have there. Your use of the other site is subject to the terms of use and privacy statement on that site.
It is possible that some of the products on the other site not be licensed for sale in Canada.
Your browser is out of date
With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.
By choosing to accept, you acknowledge that you are a Certified Healthcare Professional.
The TYRX™ neuro absorbable antibacterial envelope is designed to provide device stabilization when implanted. The envelope also contains the antimicrobial agents rifampin and minocycline, which have been shown to reduce infection in an in vivo model of bacterial challenge following surgical implantation.*
GET MORE PRODUCT DETAILSThe TYRX™ Neuro Absorbable Antibacterial Envelope shares technology with the TYRX™ Absorbable Antibacterial Envelope for cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs). The largest randomized controlled, global trial with CIEDs showed a reduced rate of infections among high-risk patients with CIEDs.1
Disclaimer
The evidence for reduction of device infection with the TYRX™ neuro absorbable antibacterial envelope is based on data with cardiac implantable electronic devices as demonstrated via a randomized controlled clinical trial1 and multiple clinical studies.12 To date, there has been no published clinical studies on TYRX™ neuro with implantable neurostimulators.
TYRX™ neuro absorbable antibacterial envelope instructions for use.
Minimum inhibitory concentration
Infection rates vary by study and clinical practice
Infection data based on cardiovascular procedures against pathogens that commonly inhabit a wound bed in subcutaneous tissue pockets
Tarakji KG, Mittal S, Kennergren C, et al. Antibacterial envelope to prevent cardiac implantable device infection. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(20):1895-1905.
Huntingdon Life Sciences Study TR-2011-054.
Huntingdon Life Sciences Study TR-2013-001.
Carson CC, 3rd. Efficacy of antibiotic impregnation of inflatable penile prostheses in decreasing infection in original implants. The Journal of Urology. 2004;171(4):1611-1614.
Noblett K, Benson K, Kreder K. Detailed analysis of adverse events and surgical interventions in a large prospective trial of sacral neuromodulation therapy for overactive bladder patients. Neurourol. Urodynam. 2017; 36(4):1136-1139.
Bielefeldt K. Adverse events of sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence reported to the federal drug administration. World J Gastrointest Pharmacol Ther. 2016;7(2):294-305.
Henrikson CA, Sohail MR, Acosta H, et al. Antibacterial envelope Is associated with low infection rates after implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy device replacement: Results of the Citadel and Centurion Studies. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(10):1158-1167.
Mittal S, Shaw RE, Michel K et al. Cardiac implantable electronic device infections: incidence, risk factors, and the effect of the AigisRX antibacterial envelope. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11(4):595-601.
Kolek MJ, Dresen WF, Wells QS, Ellis CR. Use of an antibacterial envelope is associated with reduced cardiac implantable electronic device infections in high-risk patients. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2013;36:354-361.
Kolek MJ, Patel NJ, Clair WK et al. Efficacy of a bio-absorbable antibacterial envelope to prevent cardiac implantable electronic device infections in high-risk subjects. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(10):1111-1116.
Shariff N, Eby E, Adelstein E et al. Health and economic outcomes associated with use of an antimicrobial envelope as a standard of care for cardiac implantable electronic device implantation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2015;26(7):783-789.
Kumar A, Doshi R, Shariff M. Role of antibiotic envelopes in preventing cardiac implantable electronic device infection: A meta-analysis of 14 859 procedures. J Arrhythm. 36(1):176-179.