You just clicked a link to go to another website. If you continue, you will leave this site and go to a site run by someone else.
Medtronic Canada does not review or control the content on the other website, and is not responsible for any business dealings or transactions you have there. Your use of the other site is subject to the terms of use and privacy statement on that site.
It is possible that some of the products on the other site not be licensed for sale in Canada.
Your browser is out of date
With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.
By choosing to accept, you acknowledge that you are a Certified Healthcare Professional.
The IN.PACT clinical program covers multiple trials and patient populations with varying disease states. The data collected is robust and demonstrates the durability, consistency, and safety of the IN.PACT Admiral drug-coated balloon (DCB) as a proven therapy for patients with peripheral artery disease.
The outcomes from the IN.PACT SFA Trial demonstrate long-term safety and effectiveness, with 75% of patients reintervention-free through five years.1
Study type |
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial |
---|---|
Primary endpoints |
Effectiveness: primary patency* Safety: safety composite† |
Rigor and quality |
|
Patients |
331 patients |
Sites |
57 sites (U.S., EU) |
Key eligibility criteria |
|
|
IN.PACT SFA |
PTA |
P-value‡ |
---|---|---|---|
Clinically driven TLR§ |
25.5% |
35.6% |
0.080 |
Primary safety compositell |
70.7% |
59.6% |
0.068 |
Major adverse events¶ |
42.9% |
48.1% |
0.459 |
All-cause death |
15.8% |
9.6% |
0.156 |
Device- or procedure-related death through five years# |
0.0% |
0.0% |
N/A |
CD-TVR |
29.3% |
40.4% |
0.068 |
Major target limb amputation |
0.5% |
0.0% |
1.000 |
Thrombosis |
2.2% |
4.8% |
0.292 |
The IN.PACT Global Study was a real-world registry of 1,535 patients from 64 sites across the globe. This study proved the durability, consistency, and safety of the IN.PACT Admiral DCB in complex patients and lesion types.
Study type |
Prospective, multicenter, single-arm study |
---|---|
Primary endpoints |
Effectiveness: freedom from CD-TLR (all subjects)†† Effectiveness: primary patency (imaging cohort) Safety: safety composite† |
Rigor and quality |
|
Patients |
1,535 patients |
Sites |
64 sites (EU, Middle East, Latin America, Asia) |
Key eligibility criteria |
|
|
Lesion length |
Primary patency |
CD-TLR |
Thrombosis |
Major target limb amputation |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
IN.PACT Global (DCB ARM) (N = 1,406) |
12.09 |
N/A |
7.5% |
2.9% |
0.2% |
IN.PACT Global long lesion imaging cohort (N = 157) |
26.40 |
91.1% |
6.0% |
3.7% |
0.0% |
IN.PACT Global ISR imaging cohort (N = 131) |
17.17 |
88.7% |
7.3% |
0.8% |
0.0% |
IN.PACT Global CTO imaging cohort (N = 126) |
22.83 |
85.3% |
11.3% |
4.3% |
0.0% |
IN.PACT Global complex lesion sub-cohort (N = 227)10 |
28.74 |
89.1% |
7.1% |
3.3% |
0.0% |
Real-world data from the IN.PACT Global Study confirms long-term clinical safety and effectiveness of IN.PACT Admiral DCB.
IN.PACT global full cohort five-year freedom from CD-TLR rate: 69.4%11
The IN.PACT SFA Japan Trial continues to demonstrate the durability, consistency, and safety of IN.PACT Admiral DCB compared to PTA.
Study type |
Prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled pivotal trial |
---|---|
Primary endpoints |
Effectiveness: primary patency† Safety: safety composite† |
Rigor and quality |
|
Patients |
100 patients |
Sites |
11 sites (Japan) |
Key eligibility criteria |
|
|
MDT-2113 DCB |
PTA |
P-value |
---|---|---|---|
Clinically driven TLR |
14.9% |
20.7% |
0.554 |
Primary safety composite‡‡
|
83.6% |
75.9% |
0.402 |
30-day device- and procedure-related death |
0.0% |
0.0% |
> 0.999 |
Major adverse event§§ |
20.9% |
31.0% |
0.306 |
Major target limb amputation |
0.0% |
0.0% |
> 0.999 |
Clinically driven TVR |
16.4% |
24.1% |
0.402 |
All-cause death |
6.0% |
6.9% |
1.000 |
Thrombosis |
1.5% |
0.0% |
1.000 |
Reach a Medtronic sales rep
Contact us here
CardioVascular Lifeline Customer Support
(877) 526-7890
rs.cstechsupport@medtronic.com
Orders
(888) 879-0977
rs.canomshospitals@medtronic.com
24-hour technical support
763-514-4000 (worldwide)
Freedom from CD-TLR and DUS-derived restenosis (PSVR ≤ 2.4) at 12 months.
Composite 30-day freedom for device- and procedure-related mortality and 12-month freedom from major target limb amputation and CD-TVR.
Unless otherwise indicated, all tests were for superiority using the Fisher’s exact test for binary variables and t-test for continuous variables.
Clinically driven TLR adjudicated by an independent Clinical Event Committee, blinded to the assigned treatment based on any reintervention at the target lesion due to symptoms or drop of ABI of ≥ 20% or > 0.15 when compared to post-procedure baseline ABI.
Safety Composite Endpoint consists of: Freedom from device- and procedure-related death through 30 days post-index procedure and freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically driven target vessel revascularization (TVR) within 12 months post-index procedure.
Composite of death, clinically driven TVR, target limb major amputation, and thrombosis.
All deaths adjudicated by the CEC.
Number at risk represents the number of evaluable subjects at the beginning of each 30-day window.
Defined as TLR due to symptoms or drop of ABI/TBI of > 20% or > 0.15 when compared to post-procedure baseline ABI/TBI.
Primary safety composite is defined as freedom from device- and procedure-related 30-day death and freedom from target limb major amputation and clinically driven TVR through 36 months.
MAE is defined as composite of death, clinically driven TVR, target limb major amputation, and thrombosis within 36 months.
Laird JA, Schneider PA, Jaff MR, et al. Long-Term Clinical Effectiveness of a Drug-Coated Balloon for the Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions. 5-year results from the IN.PACT SFA Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. June 2019;12(6):e007702.
Tepe G, Laird J, Schneider P, et al. Drug-coated balloon versus standard percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of superficial femoral and popliteal peripheral artery disease: 12-month results from the IN.PACT SFA randomized trial. Circulation. February 3, 2015;131(5):495-502.
Laird J, Schneider PA, Tepe G, et al. Durability of Treatment Effect Using a Drug-Coated Balloon for Femoropopliteal Lesions: 24-Month Results of IN.PACT SFA. J Am Coll Cardiol. December 1, 2015;66(21):2329-2338.
Schneider PA, Laird J, Tepe G, et al. Treatment Effect of Drug-Coated Balloons Is Durable to 3 Years in the Femoropopliteal Arteries: Long-Term Results of the IN.PACT SFA Randomized Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. January 2018;11(1):e005891.
Zeller T, Ansel GM, Brodmann M, Keirse K, et al. Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions Typically Excluded From Clinical Trials: 12-Month Findings From the IN.PACT Global Study. J Endovasc Ther. December 2018;25(6):673-682.
Scheinert D, Micari A, Brodmann M, et al. Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. October 2018;11(10):e005654.
Brodmann M, Keirse K, Scheinert D, et al. Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: The IN.PACT Global Study De Novo In-Stent Restenosis Imaging Cohort. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. October 23, 2017;10(20):2113-2123.
Tepe G, Micari A, Keirse K, et al. Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment for Femoropopliteal Artery Disease: The Chronic Total Occlusion Cohort in the IN.PACT Global Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. March 11, 2019;12(5):484-493.
Reijnen MMPJ, van Wijck I, Zeller T, et al. Outcomes After Drug-Coated Balloon Treatment of Femoropopliteal Lesions in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia: A Post Hoc Analysis From the IN.PACT Global Study. J Endovasc Ther. June 2019;26(3):305-315.
Soga Y, Iida O, Urasawa K, et al. Three-Year Results of the IN.PACT SFA Japan Trial Comparing Drug-Coated Balloons With Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty. J Endovasc Ther. December 2020;27(6):946–955.
Tepe G. 5-year results from the IN.PACT Global Study Prespecified Cohorts: ISR, CTO and Long Lesions. Presented at VIVA, 2021.
Iida O, Soga Y, Urasawa K, et al. Drug-Coated Balloon vs Standard Percutaneous Transluminal Angioplasty for the Treatment of Atherosclerotic Lesions in the Superficial Femoral and Proximal Popliteal Arteries: One-Year Results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan Randomized Trial. J Endovasc Ther. February 2018;25(1):109-117.
Iida O, Soga Y, Urasawa K et al. Drug-coated balloon versus uncoated percutaneous transluminal angioplasty for the treatment of atherosclerotic lesions in the superficial femoral and proximal popliteal artery: 2-year results of the MDT-2113 SFA Japan randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. March 1, 2019;93(4):664-672.