PlasmaBlade™ Precision.
Bleeding control.
Less smoke.

Precise Soft Tissue Dissection Devices.
Breast, Electrophysiology, Orthopaedic, Spinal, Neurological, and General Surgical Applications

Contact us
Closeup of the PlasmaBlade X handpiece.

Overview

The PlasmaBlade™ soft tissue dissection device uses brief, precise pulses of radiofrequency (RF) energy to cut and coagulate soft tissue. RF energy, combined with a proprietary insulation technology, enables the PlasmaBlade to dissect with the precision of a scalpel, and the bleeding control of traditional electrosurgery, while producing minimal thermal damage to surrounding tissue. Clinical research has demonstrated that low thermal injury technology offers intra-operative and post-operative benefits when compared to the current standard of care — scalpel and traditional electrosurgery.1,2,3


Product details

PlasmaBlade™ versus Traditional Electrosurgery
Thermal image profile 

These histologic profiles4 compare thermal injury (red) with PlasmaBlade™ and traditional electrosurgery devices at similar cut settings.  

PlasmaBlade CUT 6 Histology Image

PlasmaBlade™ device incision using the CUT 6 setting, showing low thermal injury.

Traditional Electrosurgery CUT 35W

Incision using a traditional electrosurgical tool using the CUT 35W setting, showing significant thermal injury.

Operating temperature profile5,*

Higher operating temperature is shown in infrared images.

PlasmaBlade™ dissection device:
40-170° C

Operating temperature profile of the PlasmaBlade™ device dissection device using infrared imaging.

Operating temperature profile of the PlasmaBlade™ device dissection device using infrared imaging.

Traditional electrosurgery:
200-350° C

Operating temperature profile of traditional electrosurgery using infrared imaging.

Operating temperature profile of traditional electrosurgery using infrared imaging.

Observed benefits

Lower temperature
Barialink support imagery virtual classroom
  • 64% average reduction in blade temperature for similar CUT settings compared to traditional electrosurgery1
  • 45% average reduction in blade temperature for similar COAG settings compared to traditional electrosurgery1
Incision healing
Barialink support imagery virtual classroom
  • Equivalent cutaneous healing to scalpel5,*
  • Significantly reduced thermal injury depth and scar width compared to traditional electrosurgery6
Increased efficiency
Barialink support imagery virtual classroom
  • Maintains cutting effectiveness and hemostatic ability even when submerged in liquefied tissue or blood, unlike traditional electrosurgical tools7
Reduced surgical smoke
Barialink support imagery virtual classroom
  • Less surgical smoke,8 allowing for increased visibility
Reduced risk
Barialink support imagery virtual classroom
  • Eliminates risk of inadvertent scalpel injury

Surgical Applications

Breast oncology 

  • Mastectomy
  • Skin-sparing mastectomy
  • Nipple-sparing mastectomy
  • Oncoplasty

Cardiac implantable electronic devices

  • Generator changeouts
  • Generator replacements
  • Generator upgrades
  • Capsulectomy

Orthopaedics 

  • Total knee arthroplasty
  • Total hip arthroplasty

Spine

  • Anterior cervical discectomy infusion
  • Multilevel spinal fusions
  • Posterior cervical discectomy and fusion
  • Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF)
  • Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF)
  • Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF)
  • Minimally invasive TLIF
  • Scoliosis surgery
  • Laminotomy, discectomy, decompression

Model Features


AEX Generator

Powers all Aquamantys™ and PlasmaBlade™ devices and provides simultaneous activation of both technologies.

  • Touchscreen interface
  • Four memory settings
  • Lightweight
  • Rapid startup and priming
aex generator product-image

PlasmaBlade™ 3.0S
  • Ergonomic handle design for comfort and control
  • Adjustable telescoping shaft
  • Locking mechanism to secure shaft at desired length
  • Integrated smoke evacuation
 PlasmaBlade 3.0S

PlasmaBlade™ X 3.0S LIGHT dissection device
  • adjustable telescoping shaft
  • integrated smoke evacuation
  • a bendable blade
  • 4 LEDs to illuminate the surgical site  

Electrode Width: 3.0 mm Device Length: 7 – 10.6 inches

PlasmaBlade x 3

PlasmaBlade™ X 4.0S dissection device
  • bendable blade
  • rotating finger grip
  • integrated smoke evacuation

Electrode Width: 4.0 mm Device Length: 6.8 inches

plasmablade x-4s dissection device


PlasmaBlade™ 4.0
  • Ergonomic handle design for comfort and control
  • Bendable shaft
  • Rotating finger grip
PlasmaBlade 4.0
This material is for Healthcare Professionals in countries with applicable health authority product registrations. Important: Always refer to the Instructions For Use (IFU) packaged with the product/e-IFU for complete instructions, indications, contraindications, warnings, and precautions.
*

Operating temperature is a function of device settings, electrode configuration and treatment time. Operating temperatures outside this range may be observed.

1

Ruidiaz ME, Messmer D, Atmodjo DY, et al. Comparative healing of human cutaneous surgical incisions created by the PEAK PlasmaBlade, conventional electrosurgery, and a standard scalpel. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128(1):104-111.

2

Fine RE, Vose JG. Traditional electrosurgery and a low-thermal-injury dissection device yield different outcomes following bilateral skin-sparing mastectomy: a case report. Journal of Medical Case Reports. 2011, 5:212.

3

Loh SA, Carlson GA, Chang EI, Huang E, Palanker D, Gurtner GC. Comparative healing of surgical incisions created by the PEAK PlasmaBlade, conventional electrosurgery, and a scalpel. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124(6):1849-1859.

4

Histology Images for: Evaluation pf Tissue Depth of Effect on the PlasmaBlade(TM) 4.0 and Electrosurgical Pencil using Histology with Fixture ("CUT") 10.2014

5

PEAK vs Other ESU IR Temperature Profile Data 09.2011

6

Cao J, Steiner P, Vose JG. Electrical interference in ICD ventricular sense channel: Medtronic PEAK PlasmaBlade compared to traditional electrosurgery. APHRS November 2015.

7

Palanker DV, Vankov A, Huie P. Electrosurgery with cellular precision. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng. 2008;55(2 Pt 2):838-841.

8

Evaluation of Surgical Smoke Contamination (Mass of Smoke Particulate) Using Electrosurgical Devices 09.2014