Your browser is out of date

With an updated browser, you will have a better Medtronic website experience. Update my browser now.

×

Skip to main content

Research and
clinical study

Contact us
Screw placement accuracy
Less than 1 of patients
Reduction in radiation exposure
Mazor product image
Reduction in fluoroscopy time
2.6 days less in hospital
Free from complications

Want to be part of
Mazor™ activities?
Please get in touch

Contact us

This material is for Healthcare Professionals in countries with applicable health authority product registrations.

Important: Always refer to the Instructions For Use (IFU) packaged with the product/e-IFU for complete instructions, indications, contraindications, warnings, and precautions. 

For further information, contact your local Medtronic representative and/or consult the Medtronic website at cema.medtronic.com.

The commercial name of Mazor™ is Mazor X Stealth™ Edition.


PAGE REFERENCES:

1. Schroerlucke SR, Wang MY, Cannestra AF, et al. Complication Rate in Robotic-Guided vs Fluoro-Guided Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery: Report from MIS Refresh Prospective Comparative Study. Spine J, 2017; S254-S255 – abstract P176.
2. Van Dijk JD, van den Ende RPJ, Stramigioli S, et al. Clinical Pedicle Screw Accuracy and Deviation From Planning in Robot-Guided Spine. Spine, 2015; 40: E986-E991.
3. Staartjes, et al. World Neurosurgery, 2018; 116: 433-443.
4. Lieberman, et al. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2012; 25(5): 241–248.
5. Hyun, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017; 42(6):353–358.
6. van Dijk, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2015; 40(17): E986–E991.
7. Roser, et al. Neurosurgery, 2013; 72 (SUPPL. 1):A12–A18.
8. Khan, et al. World Neurosurg, 2019; 123:e474-e481.
9. Schroerlucke, et al. Spine J, 2017; 17(10): S254–255 (abstracts NASS 32nd AnnualMeeting).
10. Fan, et al. Med Sci Monit, 2017; 23:5960-5968.