Research and
clinical study

Executing the procedure with
high level of precision and
predictability,1,2 reduce revision
rate and length of stay at the
hospital of your patient.

 

Contact us
Screw placement accuracy
Less than 1 of patients
Reduction in radiation exposure
Mazor product image
Reduction in fluoroscopy time
2.6 days less in hospital
Free from complications

Want to be part of
Mazor™ activities? Please get in touch

  

Contact us

This material is for Healthcare Professionals in countries with applicable health authority product registrations.

Important: Always refer to the Instructions For Use (IFU) packaged with the product/e-IFU for complete instructions, indications, contraindications, warnings, and precautions. 

For further information, contact your local Medtronic representative and/or consult the Medtronic website at cema.medtronic.com.

The commercial name of Mazor™ is Mazor X Stealth™ Edition.


PAGE REFERENCES:

1. Schroerlucke SR, Wang MY, Cannestra AF, et al. Complication Rate in Robotic-Guided vs Fluoro-Guided Minimally Invasive Spinal Fusion Surgery: Report from MIS Refresh Prospective Comparative Study. Spine J, 2017; S254-S255 – abstract P176.
2. Van Dijk JD, van den Ende RPJ, Stramigioli S, et al. Clinical Pedicle Screw Accuracy and Deviation From Planning in Robot-Guided Spine. Spine, 2015; 40: E986-E991.
3. Staartjes, et al. World Neurosurgery, 2018; 116: 433-443.
4. Lieberman, et al. J Spinal Disord Tech, 2012; 25(5): 241–248.
5. Hyun, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2017; 42(6):353–358.
6. van Dijk, et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 2015; 40(17): E986–E991.
7. Roser, et al. Neurosurgery, 2013; 72 (SUPPL. 1):A12–A18.
8. Khan, et al. World Neurosurg, 2019; 123:e474-e481.
9. Schroerlucke, et al. Spine J, 2017; 17(10): S254–255 (abstracts NASS 32nd AnnualMeeting).
10. Fan, et al. Med Sci Monit, 2017; 23:5960-5968.