In 1999, we revolutionized surgery with the introduction of LigaSure™ vessel-sealing technology — and we didn’t stop there. Our latest innovation, the LigaSure™ curved jaw device, brings proven LigaSure™ technology to a reposable device that is both easy to use and cost effective.
Let’s put the most innovative tools in your hands. And let’s put patients first and work together to redefine the standard of care with LigaSure™ technology in open surgery.
LigaSure™ technology:
LigaSure™ technology helps manage costs by significantly reducing procedure time and patients’ hospital stay4,([FOOTNOTE=Levy B, Emery L. Randomized Trial of Suture Versus Electrosurgical Bipolar Vessel Sealing in Vaginal Hysterectomy. Obstetrics and Gynecology. 2003 Jul;102(1):147-151.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),([FOOTNOTE=Cronje HS, et al. Electrosurgical bipolar vessel sealing during vaginal hysterectomy. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Dec;91(3):243.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=])
Features a reusable clamp along with a disposable single-use electrode to minimize waste compared with single-use devices([FOOTNOTE=Based on internal test report #R0058454, LF3225 – Marketing claims China validation lab – plan and report. April 2014.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=])
The clamp-like design feels familiar in your hand. It is intuitive for surgeons without previous LigaSure™ experience and allows for excellent control.9
Combining the essential elements of surgery: grasping, sealing and cutting, the exchange of instruments is minimized as compared to mechanical ligation.9
Generator Compatibility | Valleylab™ FT10 Energy Platform, Valleylab™ LS10 Generator (where available), ForceTriad™ Energy Platform |
Since the 1999 introduction of LigaSure™ vessel-sealing technology, we’ve continued to innovate upon the technology creating a suite of advanced energy devices for open and laparoscopic surgery.
External clinical studies comparing LigaSure™ technology to mechanical ligation have shown LigaSure™ technology to:
Decrease operative blood loss5,6,7,([FOOTNOTE=Targarona, et al. A prospective randomized comparison of conventional electrosurgery, biopolar computer-controlled electrosurgery and ultrasonic dissection. Operative Outcome and Cost analysis. Surgical Innovation. 2005 Dec;12(4):339-344.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),([FOOTNOTE=Leonardo C, et al. Laparoscopic nephrectomy using LigaSure system: preliminary experience. Journal of Endourology. 2005 Oct;19(8):976-8. 7.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]) |
|
Reduce perioperative blood loss5,([FOOTNOTE=Daskalopoulos G et al. Electrothermal bipolar coagulation for radical prostatectomies and cystectomies: a preliminary case-controlled study. International Urology and Nephrology. 2004;36(2):181-185.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]),([FOOTNOTE=Romano F, et al. Laparoscopic Splenectomy: LigaSure versus EndoGIA: A Comparative Study. J Laparoendoscopic & Adv Surg Techniques. 2007. Vol. 17, No. 6.],[ANCHOR=],[LINK=]) |
|
Cut down procedure time7,8,10,11,12 |
|
Lessen the length of hospital stay11 |